![da vinci code ending da vinci code ending](https://thecinemaholic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/B0068SUMU6_TheDaVinciCode_UXSY1._V144614625_SX1080_.jpg)
Da vinci code ending series#
I demonstrate a series of specific and undeniable proofs of verifiable fraud in the Christianized Book of Revelation, which also appear throughout the New Testament.įurthermore, I have produced stunning and comprehensive proof that the ancient symbology used to construct sealed Hebrew texts is an ancient philosophical technology. I have produced comprehensive and verifiable proof that the original pre-Christian Apocalypse (Book of Revelation) was a symbolically encrypted wisdom text that was stolen and modified by the founders of Christianity. I know many readers of this site will want to scoff at this information before bothering to pay attention to the details. Now, I’ve written an extensive tome proving that Christianity is a purposeful deception. You see, I’m the one all the lies were told about about the millennia. Unlike most of you, I have a very personal interest in ancient wisdom symbology, false prophecy based on its misrepresentation, and deceptions imposed in the name of religion. How do we finally solve these ages-old mysteries? To recast a common political adage, “It’s the symbology stupid!” Ehrman’s latest attempt to clear the waters muddied by The Da Vinci Code.Įhrman’s newest book, Peter, Paul and Mary Magdalene, is now available!īoth sides of this argument are based on interpretations of a Roman fantasy purposely designed to hide the truth about the future Messiah and the true nature of the Creator. Roman Catholic scholars think the same of it as non-Catholics there’s nothing secretive about it.Ĭlick here to read “The Truth about Mary Magdalene”. It’s a hypothetical document that scholars have posited as having been available to Matthew and Luke, principally a collection of the sayings of Jesus.
![da vinci code ending da vinci code ending](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/IeUxhhTzUHY/maxresdefault.jpg)
The Q document is not a surviving source being hid by the Vatican, nor is it a book allegedly written by Jesus himself. Mary Magdalene was pregnant at the crucifixion? That’s a good one.ġ0. We have no idea about the lineage of Mary Magdalene nothing connects her with the “house of Benjamin.” And even if she were, this wouldn’t make her a descendent of David.ĩ. The Dead Sea Scrolls were not among “the earliest Christian records.” They are Jewish, with nothing Christian in them.Ĩ. “Jewish decorum” in no way forbade “a Jewish man to be unmarried.” In fact, most of the community behind the Dead Sea Scrolls were male unmarried celibates.ħ. And the Nag Hammadi documents do not tell the Grail story at all, nor do they emphasize Jesus’ human traits. The Dead Sea Scrolls were not “found in the 1950s.” It was 1947. For another thing, the books that did get included are chock-full of references to his human traits (he gets hungry, tired, angry he gets upset he bleeds, he dies…).ĥ. For one thing, he didn’t commission a new Bible at all. Constantine did not commission a “new Bible” that omitted references to Jesus’ human traits.
![da vinci code ending da vinci code ending](https://critictree264.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/5/4/125448813/181843470.jpg)
![da vinci code ending da vinci code ending](https://www.picclickimg.com/o8MAAOSwziNg~OxG/WHO-CAN-CRACK-THE-LEONARDO-DA-VINCI-CODE.jpg)
(Some thought he was so divine he wasn’t even human!)Ĥ. It’s absolutely not true that Jesus was not considered divine until the Council of Nicea, that before that he was considered merely as “a mortal prophet.” The vast majority of Christians by the early fourth century acknowledged him as divine. It’s not true that eighty Gospels “were considered for the New Testament.” This makes it sound like there was a contest, entered by mail.ģ. Jesus’ life was decidedly not “recorded by thousands of followers across the land.” He didn’t even have thousands of followers, let alone literate ones.Ģ.
Da vinci code ending movie#
With the world-wide release of The DaVinci Code movie fast approaching, as a service to our readers, we post Bart Ehrman’s list of the 10 historical errors contained in the book.ġ.